• USC Libraries
  • Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

  • 5. The Literature Review
  • Purpose of Guide
  • Design Flaws to Avoid
  • Independent and Dependent Variables
  • Glossary of Research Terms
  • Reading Research Effectively
  • Narrowing a Topic Idea
  • Broadening a Topic Idea
  • Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
  • Academic Writing Style
  • Applying Critical Thinking
  • Choosing a Title
  • Making an Outline
  • Paragraph Development
  • Research Process Video Series
  • Executive Summary
  • The C.A.R.S. Model
  • Background Information
  • The Research Problem/Question
  • Theoretical Framework
  • Citation Tracking
  • Content Alert Services
  • Evaluating Sources
  • Primary Sources
  • Secondary Sources
  • Tiertiary Sources
  • Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
  • Qualitative Methods
  • Quantitative Methods
  • Insiderness
  • Using Non-Textual Elements
  • Limitations of the Study
  • Common Grammar Mistakes
  • Writing Concisely
  • Avoiding Plagiarism
  • Footnotes or Endnotes?
  • Further Readings
  • Generative AI and Writing
  • USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
  • Bibliography

A literature review surveys prior research published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. Literature reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have used in researching a particular topic and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within existing scholarship about the topic.

Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2014.

Importance of a Good Literature Review

A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories . A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem. The analytical features of a literature review might:

  • Give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations,
  • Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates,
  • Depending on the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant research, or
  • Usually in the conclusion of a literature review, identify where gaps exist in how a problem has been researched to date.

Given this, the purpose of a literature review is to:

  • Place each work in the context of its contribution to understanding the research problem being studied.
  • Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration.
  • Identify new ways to interpret prior research.
  • Reveal any gaps that exist in the literature.
  • Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies.
  • Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort.
  • Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional research.
  • Locate your own research within the context of existing literature [very important].

Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2011; Knopf, Jeffrey W. "Doing a Literature Review." PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (January 2006): 127-132; Ridley, Diana. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students . 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2012.

Types of Literature Reviews

It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish. Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the primary studies. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally among scholars that become part of the body of epistemological traditions within the field.

In composing a literature review, it is important to note that it is often this third layer of knowledge that is cited as "true" even though it often has only a loose relationship to the primary studies and secondary literature reviews. Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are a number of approaches you could adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study.

Argumentative Review This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply embedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Given the value-laden nature of some social science research [e.g., educational reform; immigration control], argumentative approaches to analyzing the literature can be a legitimate and important form of discourse. However, note that they can also introduce problems of bias when they are used to make summary claims of the sort found in systematic reviews [see below].

Integrative Review Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or research problems. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. This is the most common form of review in the social sciences.

Historical Review Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent. Historical literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research.

Methodological Review A review does not always focus on what someone said [findings], but how they came about saying what they say [method of analysis]. Reviewing methods of analysis provides a framework of understanding at different levels [i.e. those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches, and data collection and analysis techniques], how researchers draw upon a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection, and data analysis. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware of and consider as you go through your own study.

Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review. The goal is to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the research about a clearly defined research problem . Typically it focuses on a very specific empirical question, often posed in a cause-and-effect form, such as "To what extent does A contribute to B?" This type of literature review is primarily applied to examining prior research studies in clinical medicine and allied health fields, but it is increasingly being used in the social sciences.

Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The theoretical literature review helps to establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. Often this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework.

NOTE : Most often the literature review will incorporate some combination of types. For example, a review that examines literature supporting or refuting an argument, assumption, or philosophical problem related to the research problem will also need to include writing supported by sources that establish the history of these arguments in the literature.

Baumeister, Roy F. and Mark R. Leary. "Writing Narrative Literature Reviews."  Review of General Psychology 1 (September 1997): 311-320; Mark R. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Kennedy, Mary M. "Defining a Literature." Educational Researcher 36 (April 2007): 139-147; Petticrew, Mark and Helen Roberts. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide . Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2006; Torracro, Richard. "Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples." Human Resource Development Review 4 (September 2005): 356-367; Rocco, Tonette S. and Maria S. Plakhotnik. "Literature Reviews, Conceptual Frameworks, and Theoretical Frameworks: Terms, Functions, and Distinctions." Human Ressource Development Review 8 (March 2008): 120-130; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.

Structure and Writing Style

I.  Thinking About Your Literature Review

The structure of a literature review should include the following in support of understanding the research problem :

  • An overview of the subject, issue, or theory under consideration, along with the objectives of the literature review,
  • Division of works under review into themes or categories [e.g. works that support a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative approaches entirely],
  • An explanation of how each work is similar to and how it varies from the others,
  • Conclusions as to which pieces are best considered in their argument, are most convincing of their opinions, and make the greatest contribution to the understanding and development of their area of research.

The critical evaluation of each work should consider :

  • Provenance -- what are the author's credentials? Are the author's arguments supported by evidence [e.g. primary historical material, case studies, narratives, statistics, recent scientific findings]?
  • Methodology -- were the techniques used to identify, gather, and analyze the data appropriate to addressing the research problem? Was the sample size appropriate? Were the results effectively interpreted and reported?
  • Objectivity -- is the author's perspective even-handed or prejudicial? Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point?
  • Persuasiveness -- which of the author's theses are most convincing or least convincing?
  • Validity -- are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject?

II.  Development of the Literature Review

Four Basic Stages of Writing 1.  Problem formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues? 2.  Literature search -- finding materials relevant to the subject being explored. 3.  Data evaluation -- determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. 4.  Analysis and interpretation -- discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature.

Consider the following issues before writing the literature review: Clarify If your assignment is not specific about what form your literature review should take, seek clarification from your professor by asking these questions: 1.  Roughly how many sources would be appropriate to include? 2.  What types of sources should I review (books, journal articles, websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? 3.  Should I summarize, synthesize, or critique sources by discussing a common theme or issue? 4.  Should I evaluate the sources in any way beyond evaluating how they relate to understanding the research problem? 5.  Should I provide subheadings and other background information, such as definitions and/or a history? Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature review sections. Read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize your final review. The bibliography or reference section of sources you've already read, such as required readings in the course syllabus, are also excellent entry points into your own research. Narrow the Topic The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to obtain a good survey of relevant resources. Your professor will probably not expect you to read everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make the act of reviewing easier if you first limit scope of the research problem. A good strategy is to begin by searching the USC Libraries Catalog for recent books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues. You can also review the indexes of books to find references to specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. For example, a book surveying the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may include a chapter on the role Egypt has played in mediating the conflict, or look in the index for the pages where Egypt is mentioned in the text. Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines require that you use information that is as current as possible. This is particularly true in disciplines in medicine and the sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very quickly as new discoveries are made. However, when writing a review in the social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be required. In other words, a complete understanding the research problem requires you to deliberately examine how knowledge and perspectives have changed over time. Sort through other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. You can also use this method to explore what is considered by scholars to be a "hot topic" and what is not.

III.  Ways to Organize Your Literature Review

Chronology of Events If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials according to when they were published. This approach should only be followed if a clear path of research building on previous research can be identified and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of development. For example, a literature review that focuses on continuing research about the emergence of German economic power after the fall of the Soviet Union. By Publication Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend. For instance, you could order a review of literature on environmental studies of brown fields if the progression revealed, for example, a change in the soil collection practices of the researchers who wrote and/or conducted the studies. Thematic [“conceptual categories”] A thematic literature review is the most common approach to summarizing prior research in the social and behavioral sciences. Thematic reviews are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time, although the progression of time may still be incorporated into a thematic review. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics could focus on the development of online political satire. While the study focuses on one topic, the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics, it would still be organized chronologically reflecting technological developments in media. The difference in this example between a "chronological" and a "thematic" approach is what is emphasized the most: themes related to the role of the Internet in presidential politics. Note that more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order. A review organized in this manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the point being made. Methodological A methodological approach focuses on the methods utilized by the researcher. For the Internet in American presidential politics project, one methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of American presidents on American, British, and French websites. Or the review might focus on the fundraising impact of the Internet on a particular political party. A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed.

Other Sections of Your Literature Review Once you've decided on the organizational method for your literature review, the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out because they arise from your organizational strategy. In other words, a chronological review would have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. However, sometimes you may need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. However, only include what is necessary for the reader to locate your study within the larger scholarship about the research problem.

Here are examples of other sections, usually in the form of a single paragraph, you may need to include depending on the type of review you write:

  • Current Situation : Information necessary to understand the current topic or focus of the literature review.
  • Sources Used : Describes the methods and resources [e.g., databases] you used to identify the literature you reviewed.
  • History : The chronological progression of the field, the research literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology.
  • Selection Methods : Criteria you used to select (and perhaps exclude) sources in your literature review. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed [i.e., scholarly] sources.
  • Standards : Description of the way in which you present your information.
  • Questions for Further Research : What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review?

IV.  Writing Your Literature Review

Once you've settled on how to organize your literature review, you're ready to write each section. When writing your review, keep in mind these issues.

Use Evidence A literature review section is, in this sense, just like any other academic research paper. Your interpretation of the available sources must be backed up with evidence [citations] that demonstrates that what you are saying is valid. Be Selective Select only the most important points in each source to highlight in the review. The type of information you choose to mention should relate directly to the research problem, whether it is thematic, methodological, or chronological. Related items that provide additional information, but that are not key to understanding the research problem, can be included in a list of further readings . Use Quotes Sparingly Some short quotes are appropriate if you want to emphasize a point, or if what an author stated cannot be easily paraphrased. Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the author, is not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study. Do not use extensive quotes as a substitute for using your own words in reviewing the literature. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review. Recapitulate important features of a research study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study's significance and relating it to your own work and the work of others. Keep Your Own Voice While the literature review presents others' ideas, your voice [the writer's] should remain front and center. For example, weave references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording. Use Caution When Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author's information or opinions accurately and in your own words. Even when paraphrasing an author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work.

V.  Common Mistakes to Avoid

These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature.

  • Sources in your literature review do not clearly relate to the research problem;
  • You do not take sufficient time to define and identify the most relevant sources to use in the literature review related to the research problem;
  • Relies exclusively on secondary analytical sources rather than including relevant primary research studies or data;
  • Uncritically accepts another researcher's findings and interpretations as valid, rather than examining critically all aspects of the research design and analysis;
  • Does not describe the search procedures that were used in identifying the literature to review;
  • Reports isolated statistical results rather than synthesizing them in chi-squared or meta-analytic methods; and,
  • Only includes research that validates assumptions and does not consider contrary findings and alternative interpretations found in the literature.

Cook, Kathleen E. and Elise Murowchick. “Do Literature Review Skills Transfer from One Course to Another?” Psychology Learning and Teaching 13 (March 2014): 3-11; Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques . London: SAGE, 2011; Literature Review Handout. Online Writing Center. Liberty University; Literature Reviews. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Rebecca Frels. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2016; Ridley, Diana. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students . 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2012; Randolph, Justus J. “A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review." Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. vol. 14, June 2009; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016; Taylor, Dena. The Literature Review: A Few Tips On Conducting It. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Writing a Literature Review. Academic Skills Centre. University of Canberra.

Writing Tip

Break Out of Your Disciplinary Box!

Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem. For example, what might cultural anthropologists say about the continuing conflict in the Middle East? In what ways might geographers view the need for better distribution of social service agencies in large cities than how social workers might study the issue? You don’t want to substitute a thorough review of core research literature in your discipline for studies conducted in other fields of study. However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new perspective. Consult with a librarian about identifying research databases in other disciplines; almost every field of study has at least one comprehensive database devoted to indexing its research literature.

Frodeman, Robert. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity . New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Another Writing Tip

Don't Just Review for Content!

While conducting a review of the literature, maximize the time you devote to writing this part of your paper by thinking broadly about what you should be looking for and evaluating. Review not just what scholars are saying, but how are they saying it. Some questions to ask:

  • How are they organizing their ideas?
  • What methods have they used to study the problem?
  • What theories have been used to explain, predict, or understand their research problem?
  • What sources have they cited to support their conclusions?
  • How have they used non-textual elements [e.g., charts, graphs, figures, etc.] to illustrate key points?

When you begin to write your literature review section, you'll be glad you dug deeper into how the research was designed and constructed because it establishes a means for developing more substantial analysis and interpretation of the research problem.

Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1 998.

Yet Another Writing Tip

When Do I Know I Can Stop Looking and Move On?

Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the literature:

  • Look for repeating patterns in the research findings . If the same thing is being said, just by different people, then this likely demonstrates that the research problem has hit a conceptual dead end. At this point consider: Does your study extend current research?  Does it forge a new path? Or, does is merely add more of the same thing being said?
  • Look at sources the authors cite to in their work . If you begin to see the same researchers cited again and again, then this is often an indication that no new ideas have been generated to address the research problem.
  • Search Google Scholar to identify who has subsequently cited leading scholars already identified in your literature review [see next sub-tab]. This is called citation tracking and there are a number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your discipline. Here again, if the same authors are being cited again and again, this may indicate no new literature has been written on the topic.

Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Rebecca Frels. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach . Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2016; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.

  • << Previous: Theoretical Framework
  • Next: Citation Tracking >>
  • Last Updated: May 9, 2024 11:05 AM
  • URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide
  • UConn Library
  • Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide
  • Introduction

Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide — Introduction

  • Getting Started
  • How to Pick a Topic
  • Strategies to Find Sources
  • Evaluating Sources & Lit. Reviews
  • Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
  • Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
  • Citation Resources
  • Other Academic Writings

What are Literature Reviews?

So, what is a literature review? "A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries." Taylor, D.  The literature review: A few tips on conducting it . University of Toronto Health Sciences Writing Centre.

Goals of Literature Reviews

What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?  A literature could be written to accomplish different aims:

  • To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
  • To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
  • Identify a problem in a field of research 

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews .  Review of General Psychology , 1 (3), 311-320.

What kinds of sources require a Literature Review?

  • A research paper assigned in a course
  • A thesis or dissertation
  • A grant proposal
  • An article intended for publication in a journal

All these instances require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the topic.

Types of Literature Reviews

What kinds of literature reviews are written?

Narrative review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed.

  • Example : Predictors and Outcomes of U.S. Quality Maternity Leave: A Review and Conceptual Framework:  10.1177/08948453211037398  

Systematic review : "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139). Nelson, L. K. (2013). Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders . Plural Publishing.

  • Example : The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic review:  10.1057/s41599-022-01270-w

Meta-analysis : "Meta-analysis is a method of reviewing research findings in a quantitative fashion by transforming the data from individual studies into what is called an effect size and then pooling and analyzing this information. The basic goal in meta-analysis is to explain why different outcomes have occurred in different studies." (p. 197). Roberts, M. C., & Ilardi, S. S. (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology . Blackwell Publishing.

  • Example : Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis:  10.1215/00703370-9164737

Meta-synthesis : "Qualitative meta-synthesis is a type of qualitative study that uses as data the findings from other qualitative studies linked by the same or related topic." (p.312). Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts .  Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53 (3), 311-318.

  • Example : Women’s perspectives on career successes and barriers: A qualitative meta-synthesis:  10.1177/05390184221113735

Literature Reviews in the Health Sciences

  • UConn Health subject guide on systematic reviews Explanation of the different review types used in health sciences literature as well as tools to help you find the right review type
  • << Previous: Getting Started
  • Next: How to Pick a Topic >>
  • Last Updated: Sep 21, 2022 2:16 PM
  • URL: https://guides.lib.uconn.edu/literaturereview

Creative Commons

Libraries | Research Guides

Literature reviews, what is a literature review, learning more about how to do a literature review.

  • Planning the Review
  • The Research Question
  • Choosing Where to Search
  • Organizing the Review
  • Writing the Review

A literature review is a review and synthesis of existing research on a topic or research question. A literature review is meant to analyze the scholarly literature, make connections across writings and identify strengths, weaknesses, trends, and missing conversations. A literature review should address different aspects of a topic as it relates to your research question. A literature review goes beyond a description or summary of the literature you have read. 

  • Sage Research Methods Core Collection This link opens in a new window SAGE Research Methods supports research at all levels by providing material to guide users through every step of the research process. SAGE Research Methods is the ultimate methods library with more than 1000 books, reference works, journal articles, and instructional videos by world-leading academics from across the social sciences, including the largest collection of qualitative methods books available online from any scholarly publisher. – Publisher

Cover Art

  • Next: Planning the Review >>
  • Last Updated: May 2, 2024 10:39 AM
  • URL: https://libguides.northwestern.edu/literaturereviews

University of Texas

  • University of Texas Libraries

Literature Reviews

  • What is a literature review?
  • Steps in the Literature Review Process
  • Define your research question
  • Determine inclusion and exclusion criteria
  • Choose databases and search
  • Review Results
  • Synthesize Results
  • Analyze Results
  • Librarian Support

What is a Literature Review?

A literature or narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific topic or research question. The literature that is reviewed contains: books, articles, academic articles, conference proceedings, association papers, and dissertations. It contains the most pertinent studies and points to important past and current research and practices. It provides background and context, and shows how your research will contribute to the field. 

A literature review should: 

  • Provide a comprehensive and updated review of the literature;
  • Explain why this review has taken place;
  • Articulate a position or hypothesis;
  • Acknowledge and account for conflicting and corroborating points of view

From  S age Research Methods

Purpose of a Literature Review

A literature review can be written as an introduction to a study to:

  • Demonstrate how a study fills a gap in research
  • Compare a study with other research that's been done

Or it can be a separate work (a research article on its own) which:

  • Organizes or describes a topic
  • Describes variables within a particular issue/problem

Limitations of a Literature Review

Some of the limitations of a literature review are:

  • It's a snapshot in time. Unlike other reviews, this one has beginning, a middle and an end. There may be future developments that could make your work less relevant.
  • It may be too focused. Some niche studies may miss the bigger picture.
  • It can be difficult to be comprehensive. There is no way to make sure all the literature on a topic was considered.
  • It is easy to be biased if you stick to top tier journals. There may be other places where people are publishing exemplary research. Look to open access publications and conferences to reflect a more inclusive collection. Also, make sure to include opposing views (and not just supporting evidence).

Source: Grant, Maria J., and Andrew Booth. “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information & Libraries Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, June 2009, pp. 91–108. Wiley Online Library, doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.

Meryl Brodsky : Communication and Information Studies

Hannah Chapman Tripp : Biology, Neuroscience

Carolyn Cunningham : Human Development & Family Sciences, Psychology, Sociology

Larayne Dallas : Engineering

Janelle Hedstrom : Special Education, Curriculum & Instruction, Ed Leadership & Policy ​

Susan Macicak : Linguistics

Imelda Vetter : Dell Medical School

For help in other subject areas, please see the guide to library specialists by subject .

Periodically, UT Libraries runs a workshop covering the basics and library support for literature reviews. While we try to offer these once per academic year, we find providing the recording to be helpful to community members who have missed the session. Following is the most recent recording of the workshop, Conducting a Literature Review. To view the recording, a UT login is required.

  • October 26, 2022 recording
  • Last Updated: Oct 26, 2022 2:49 PM
  • URL: https://guides.lib.utexas.edu/literaturereviews

Creative Commons License

research literature review network

Something went wrong when searching for seed articles. Please try again soon.

No articles were found for that search term.

Author, year The title of the article goes here


research literature review network

“Litmaps is a game changer for finding novel literature... it has been invaluable for my productivity.... I also got my PhD student to use it and they also found it invaluable, finding several gaps they missed”

Varun Venkatesh

Austin Health, Australia

research literature review network

As a full-time researcher, Litmaps has become an indispensable tool in my arsenal. The Seed Maps and Discover features of Litmaps have transformed my literature review process, streamlining the identification of key citations while revealing previously overlooked relevant literature, ensuring no crucial connection goes unnoticed. A true game-changer indeed!

Ritwik Pandey

Doctoral Research Scholar – Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning

research literature review network

Using Litmaps for my research papers has significantly improved my workflow. Typically, I start with a single paper related to my topic. Whenever I find an interesting work, I add it to my search. From there, I can quickly cover my entire Related Work section.

David Fischer

Research Associate – University of Applied Sciences Kempten

“It's nice to get a quick overview of related literature. Really easy to use, and it helps getting on top of the often complicated structures of referencing”

Christoph Ludwig

Technische Universität Dresden, Germany

“This has helped me so much in researching the literature. Currently, I am beginning to investigate new fields and this has helped me hugely”

Aran Warren

Canterbury University, NZ

“I can’t live without you anymore! I also recommend you to my students.”

Professor at The Chinese University of Hong Kong

“Seeing my literature list as a network enhances my thinking process!”

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

“Incredibly useful tool to get to know more literature, and to gain insight in existing research”

KU Leuven, Belgium

“As a student just venturing into the world of lit reviews, this is a tool that is outstanding and helping me find deeper results for my work.”

Franklin Jeffers

South Oregon University, USA

“Any researcher could use it! The paper recommendations are great for anyone and everyone”

Swansea University, Wales

“This tool really helped me to create good bibtex references for my research papers”

Ali Mohammed-Djafari

Director of Research at LSS-CNRS, France

“Litmaps is extremely helpful with my research. It helps me organize each one of my projects and see how they relate to each other, as well as to keep up to date on publications done in my field”

Daniel Fuller

Clarkson University, USA

As a person who is an early researcher and identifies as dyslexic, I can say that having research articles laid out in the date vs cite graph format is much more approachable than looking at a standard database interface. I feel that the maps Litmaps offers lower the barrier of entry for researchers by giving them the connections between articles spaced out visually. This helps me orientate where a paper is in the history of a field. Thus, new researchers can look at one of Litmap's "seed maps" and have the same information as hours of digging through a database.

Baylor Fain

Postdoctoral Associate – University of Florida

Our Course: Learn and Teach with Litmaps

research literature review network

In order to help minimize spread of the coronavirus and protect our campus community, Cowles Library is adjusting our services, hours, and building access. Read more...

  • Research, Study, Learning
  • Archives & Special Collections

research literature review network

  • Cowles Library
  • Find Journal Articles
  • Find Articles in Related Disciplines
  • Find Streaming Video
  • Conducting a Literature Review
  • Organizations, Associations, Societies
  • For Faculty

What is a Literature Review?


A literature review, also called a review article or review of literature, surveys the existing research on a topic. The term "literature" in this context refers to published research or scholarship in a particular discipline, rather than "fiction" (like American Literature) or an individual work of literature. In general, literature reviews are most common in the sciences and social sciences.

Literature reviews may be written as standalone works, or as part of a scholarly article or research paper. In either case, the purpose of the review is to summarize and synthesize the key scholarly work that has already been done on the topic at hand. The literature review may also include some analysis and interpretation. A literature review is  not  a summary of every piece of scholarly research on a topic.

Why are literature reviews useful?

Literature reviews can be very helpful for newer researchers or those unfamiliar with a field by synthesizing the existing research on a given topic, providing the reader with connections and relationships among previous scholarship. Reviews can also be useful to veteran researchers by identifying potentials gaps in the research or steering future research questions toward unexplored areas. If a literature review is part of a scholarly article, it should include an explanation of how the current article adds to the conversation. (From: https://researchguides.drake.edu/englit/criticism)

How is a literature review different from a research article?

Research articles: "are empirical articles that describe one or several related studies on a specific, quantitative, testable research question....they are typically organized into four text sections: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion." Source: https://psych.uw.edu/storage/writing_center/litrev.pdf)

Steps for Writing a Literature Review

1. Identify and define the topic that you will be reviewing.

The topic, which is commonly a research question (or problem) of some kind, needs to be identified and defined as clearly as possible.  You need to have an idea of what you will be reviewing in order to effectively search for references and to write a coherent summary of the research on it.  At this stage it can be helpful to write down a description of the research question, area, or topic that you will be reviewing, as well as to identify any keywords that you will be using to search for relevant research.

2. Conduct a Literature Search

Use a range of keywords to search databases such as PsycINFO and any others that may contain relevant articles.  You should focus on peer-reviewed, scholarly articles . In SuperSearch and most databases, you may find it helpful to select the Advanced Search mode and include "literature review" or "review of the literature" in addition to your other search terms.  Published books may also be helpful, but keep in mind that peer-reviewed articles are widely considered to be the “gold standard” of scientific research.  Read through titles and abstracts, select and obtain articles (that is, download, copy, or print them out), and save your searches as needed. Most of the databases you will need are linked to from the Cowles Library Psychology Research guide .

3. Read through the research that you have found and take notes.

Absorb as much information as you can.  Read through the articles and books that you have found, and as you do, take notes.  The notes should include anything that will be helpful in advancing your own thinking about the topic and in helping you write the literature review (such as key points, ideas, or even page numbers that index key information).  Some references may turn out to be more helpful than others; you may notice patterns or striking contrasts between different sources; and some sources may refer to yet other sources of potential interest.  This is often the most time-consuming part of the review process.  However, it is also where you get to learn about the topic in great detail. You may want to use a Citation Manager to help you keep track of the citations you have found. 

4. Organize your notes and thoughts; create an outline.

At this stage, you are close to writing the review itself.  However, it is often helpful to first reflect on all the reading that you have done.  What patterns stand out?  Do the different sources converge on a consensus?  Or not?  What unresolved questions still remain?  You should look over your notes (it may also be helpful to reorganize them), and as you do, to think about how you will present this research in your literature review.  Are you going to summarize or critically evaluate?  Are you going to use a chronological or other type of organizational structure?  It can also be helpful to create an outline of how your literature review will be structured.

5. Write the literature review itself and edit and revise as needed.

The final stage involves writing.  When writing, keep in mind that literature reviews are generally characterized by a  summary style  in which prior research is described sufficiently to explain critical findings but does not include a high level of detail (if readers want to learn about all the specific details of a study, then they can look up the references that you cite and read the original articles themselves).  However, the degree of emphasis that is given to individual studies may vary (more or less detail may be warranted depending on how critical or unique a given study was).   After you have written a first draft, you should read it carefully and then edit and revise as needed.  You may need to repeat this process more than once.  It may be helpful to have another person read through your draft(s) and provide feedback.

6. Incorporate the literature review into your research paper draft. (note: this step is only if you are using the literature review to write a research paper. Many times the literature review is an end unto itself).

After the literature review is complete, you should incorporate it into your research paper (if you are writing the review as one component of a larger paper).  Depending on the stage at which your paper is at, this may involve merging your literature review into a partially complete Introduction section, writing the rest of the paper around the literature review, or other processes.

These steps were taken from: https://psychology.ucsd.edu/undergraduate-program/undergraduate-resources/academic-writing-resources/writing-research-papers/writing-lit-review.html#6.-Incorporate-the-literature-r

  • << Previous: Find Streaming Video
  • Next: Organizations, Associations, Societies >>
  • Last Updated: Feb 29, 2024 4:09 PM
  • URL: https://researchguides.drake.edu/psychology

research literature review network

  • 2507 University Avenue
  • Des Moines, IA 50311
  • (515) 271-2111

Trouble finding something? Try searching , or check out the Get Help page.

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, networking capability: a systematic review of literature and future research agenda.

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing

ISSN : 0885-8624

Article publication date: 5 April 2021

Issue publication date: 3 January 2022

The purpose of this paper is to scrutinize the existing literature and provide a comprehensive overview by compiling and synthesizing the dispersed body of knowledge in the networking capability (NC) literature stream. Therefore, this review study contributes to the research by presenting a summary of the NC complex construct.


The authors have tried to cover the literature gap in the NC area through a systematic review.

The theoretical contributions of this study to the NC literature stream are fourfold. First, while critically reviewing existing definitions, the authors present an integrated definition of NC. Second, the authors delineate the conceptual boundary between NC and other similar capabilities. Third, the authors found that the focal firms’ NC consists of two key dimensions: network development capability (NDC) and network management capability (NMC). Fourth, they contribute to the literature by providing a set of suggestions for further research in the NC literature stream.

Research limitations/implications

This study has some limitations, like other review studies. First, although the authors have tried their best to conduct a comprehensive literature search, they may have missed a study. Second, it should be noted that this study has confined itself to a particular stream of literature. Undoubtedly, in other streams, there will be issues similar to the concepts discussed in this study. The main purpose of this study is to integrate a series of studies that have a common theoretical foundation and fall within a particular literature stream. Although the focus of this study may be positive, it can be said that the deprivation of achievements from other similar streams is one of the limitations of this study. Third, another limitation of this study is the lack of verification of the conceptual framework derived from the literature that needs to be addressed in future research.

Practical implications

This study suggests a set of practical implications for industrial managers. First, the authors summarize the firms’ capabilities needed to develop and manage networks in one single source. Based on the conceptual framework of this study, firms can develop managerial tools, technological options, checklists and questionnaires and monitor the status of NC in their surrounding network on an ongoing basis. Second, the present research shows that some NCs are more repetitive than others, and therefore, it can be said that managers should pay more attention to them. The critical NCs, such as determining network position, determining network size, partner selection and attraction, coordination, inter-firm knowledge sharing and conflict resolution, are included in this study. Third, the argument of this study that both NDC and NMC should be considered simultaneously can be thought of as an important practical implication. Although in terms of the network life cycle, NDC is required earlier than NMC, these two capabilities should be used in parallel. Managers should not expect network development to be perfect and then network management to begin; therefore, NMCs should be used during network development.


Research shows that most network studies focus more on network antecedents and outputs and less on processes and related capabilities. Some researchers have made few efforts to identify and scrutinize capabilities related to business relationships. In this context, IMP scholars have introduced NC to emphasize the network perspective. Despite the considerable conceptual and empirical richness, the existence of different nomenclatures and theoretical diversity in NC literature has led to conceptual ambiguity and a lack of consensus on this crucial complex construct.

  • Systematic review
  • Network perspective
  • Networking capability
  • Network development capability
  • Network management capability

Arasti, M. , Garousi Mokhtarzadeh, N. and Jafarpanah, I. (2022), "Networking capability: a systematic review of literature and future research agenda", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing , Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 160-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-06-2020-0273

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

A systematic literature review for network intrusion detection system (IDS)

  • Regular Contribution
  • Published: 27 March 2023
  • Volume 22 , pages 1125–1162, ( 2023 )

Cite this article

research literature review network

  • Oluwadamilare Harazeem Abdulganiyu 1 ,
  • Taha Ait Tchakoucht 1 &
  • Yakub Kayode Saheed 2  

2338 Accesses

15 Citations

Explore all metrics

With the recent increase in internet usage, the number of important, sensitive, confidential individual and corporate data passing through internet has increasingly grown. With gaps in the security systems, attackers have attempted to intrude the network, thereby gaining access to essential and confidential information, which may cause harm to the operation of the systems, and also affect the confidentiality of the data. To counter these possible attacks, intrusion detection systems (IDSs), which is an essential branch of cybersecurity, were employed to monitor and analyze network traffic thereby detects and reports malicious activities. A large number of review papers have covered different approaches for intrusion detection in networks, most of which follow a non-systematic approach, merely made a comparison of the existing techniques without reflecting an in-depth analytical synthesis of the methodologies and performances of the approaches to give a complete understanding of the state of IDS. Nonetheless, many of these reviews investigated more about the anomaly-based IDS with more emphasis on deep-learning models, while signature, hybrid-based (signature + anomaly-based) have received minimal focus. Hence, by adhering to the principles of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), this work reviewed existing contributions on anomaly-, signature-, and hybrid-based approaches to provide a comprehensive overview of network IDS's state of the art. The articles were retrieved from seven databases (ScienceDirect, SpringerNature, IEEE, MDPI, Hindawi, PeerJ, and Taylor & Francis) which cut across various reputable journals and conference Proceedings. Among the 776 pieces of the literature identified, 71 were selected for analysis and synthesis to answer the research questions. Based on the research findings, we identified unexplored study areas and unresolved research challenges. In order to create a better IDS model, we conclude by presenting promising, high-impact future research areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

research literature review network

Similar content being viewed by others

research literature review network

Towards an efficient model for network intrusion detection system (IDS): systematic literature review

research literature review network

A Systematic Literature Review of Network Intrusion Detection System Models

research literature review network

Intrusion detection systems for IoT based on bio-inspired and machine learning techniques: a systematic review of the literature

Data availability.

Not Applicable.

Patel, A., Alhussian, H., Pedersen, J.M., Bounabat, B., Júnior, J.C., Katsikas, S.: A nifty collaborative intrusion detection and prevention architecture for smart grid ecosystems. Comput. Secur. 64 , 92–109 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2016.07.002

Article   Google Scholar  

Bridges, R.A., Glass-Vanderlan, T.R., Iannacone, M.D., Vincent, M.S., Chen, Q.: A survey of intrusion detection systems leveraging host data. ACM Comput. Surv. 52 (6), 1–35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3344382

Aldweesh, A., Derhab, A., Emam, A.Z.: Deep learning approaches for anomaly-based intrusion detection systems: a survey, taxonomy, and open issues. Knowl. Based Syst. 189 , 105124 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105124

Masdari, M., Khezri, H.: A survey and taxonomy of the fuzzy signature-based intrusion detection systems. Appl. Soft Comput. 92 , 106301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106301

Masdari, M., Khezri, H.: Towards fuzzy anomaly detection-based security: a comprehensive review. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 20 (1), 1–49 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-020-09332-x

Article   MathSciNet   MATH   Google Scholar  

Ashfaq, R.A.R., Wang, X.-Z., Huang, J.Z., Abbas, H., He, Y.-L.: Fuzziness based semi-supervised learning approach for intrusion detection system. Inf. Sci. 378 , 484–497 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.04.019

Gu, J., Wang, L., Wang, H., Wang, S.: A novel approach to intrusion detection using SVM ensemble with feature augmentation. Comput. Secur. 86 , 53–62 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2019.05.022

Nazir, A., Khan, R.A.: A novel combinatorial optimization based feature selection method for network intrusion detection. Comput. Secur. 102 , 102164 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.102164

Sohi, S.M., Seifert, J.-P., Ganji, F.: RNNIDS: enhancing network intrusion detection systems through deep learning. Comput. Secur. 102 , 102151 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.102151

Zhang, J., Ling, Y., Fu, X., Yang, X., Xiong, G., Zhang, R.: Model of the intrusion detection system based on the integration of spatial-temporal features. Comput. Secur. 89 , 101681 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2019.101681

Liu, J., Gao, Y., Hu, F.: A fast network intrusion detection system using adaptive synthetic oversampling and LightGBM. Comput. Secur. 106 , 102289 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102289

Mebawondu, J.O., Alowolodu, O.D., Mebawondu, J.O., Adetunmbi, A.O.: Network intrusion detection system using supervised learning paradigm. Sci. Afr. 9 , e00497 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00497

Wang, Z., Liu, Y., He, D., Chan, S.: Intrusion detection methods based on integrated deep learning model. Comput. Secur. 103 , 102177 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102177

Selvakumar, B., Muneeswaran, K.: Firefly algorithm based feature selection for network intrusion detection. Comput. Secur. 81 , 148–155 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2018.11.005

Ashiku, L., Dagli, C.: Network intrusion detection system using deep learning. Procedia Comput. Sci. 185 , 239–247 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.05.025

Gu, J., Lu, S.: An effective intrusion detection approach using SVM with naïve Bayes feature embedding. Comput. Secur. 103 , 102158 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.102158

Bhati, B.S., Rai, C.S., Balamurugan, B., Al-Turjman, F.: An intrusion detection scheme based on the ensemble of discriminant classifiers. Comput. Electr. Eng. 86 , 106742 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106742

Ozkan-Okay, M., Samet, R., Aslan, Ö., Gupta, D.: A comprehensive systematic literature review on intrusion detection systems. IEEE Access 9 , 157727–157760 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3129336

Maseno, E.M., Wang, Z., Xing, H.: A systematic review on hybrid intrusion detection system. Secur. Commun. Netw. 2022 , 9663052 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9663052

Luo, G., Chen, Z., Mohammed, B.O.: A systematic literature review of intrusion detection systems in the cloud-based IoT environments. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 34 (10), e6822 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.6822

Ayyagari, M.R., Kesswani, N., Kumar, M., Kumar, K.: Intrusion detection techniques in network environment: a systematic review. Wirel. Netw. 27 (2), 1269–1285 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02529-3

Alsoufi, M.A., et al.: Anomaly-based intrusion detection systems in IoT Using deep learning: a systematic literature review. Appl. Sci. (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188383

Article   MATH   Google Scholar  

Yang, Z., et al.: A systematic literature review of methods and datasets for anomaly-based network intrusion detection. Comput. Secur. 116 , 102675 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102675

Liberati, A., et al.: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339 , b2700 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P.: A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55 (12), 2049–2075 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010

Kitchenham B.A., Stuart C.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. In: EBSE Technical Report, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report, Report EBSE 2007-001 (2007). https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf

Gupta, N., Jindal, V., Bedi, P.: LIO-IDS: Handling class imbalance using LSTM and improved one-vs-one technique in intrusion detection system. Comput. Netw. 192 , 108076 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108076

Nguyen, M.T., Kim, K.: Genetic convolutional neural network for intrusion detection systems. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 113 , 418–427 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.07.042

Wu, Z., Wang, J., Hu, L., Zhang, Z., Wu, H.: A network intrusion detection method based on semantic re-encoding and deep learning. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 164 , 102688 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102688

Kim, J., Kim, J., Kim, H., Shim, M., Choi, E.: CNN-based network intrusion detection against denial-of-service attacks. Electronics (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9060916

Kanimozhi, V., Jacob, T.P.: Artificial intelligence based network intrusion detection with hyper-parameter optimization tuning on the realistic cyber dataset CSE-CIC-IDS2018 using cloud computing. ICT Express 5 (3), 211–214 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2019.03.003

Swarna Priya, R.M., et al.: An effective feature engineering for DNN using hybrid PCA-GWO for intrusion detection in IoMT architecture. Comput. Commun. 160 , 139–149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.05.048

Jia, H., Liu, J., Zhang, M., He, X., Sun, W.: Network intrusion detection based on IE-DBN model. Comput. Commun. 178 , 131–140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.07.016

Onah, J.O., Abdulhamid, Si.M., Abdullahi, M., Hassan, I.H., Al-Ghusham, A.: Genetic algorithm based feature selection and Naïve Bayes for anomaly detection in fog computing environment. Mach. Learn. Appl. 6 , 100156 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100156

Hajisalem, V., Babaie, S.: A hybrid intrusion detection system based on ABC-AFS algorithm for misuse and anomaly detection. Comput. Netw. 136 , 37–50 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.02.028

Elmasry, W., Akbulut, A., Zaim, A.H.: Evolving deep learning architectures for network intrusion detection using a double PSO metaheuristic. Comput. Netw. 168 , 107042 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2019.107042

Vijayanand, R., Devaraj, D., Kannapiran, B.: Intrusion detection system for wireless mesh network using multiple support vector machine classifiers with genetic-algorithm-based feature selection. Comput. Secur. 77 , 304–314 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2018.04.010

Li, X., Chen, W., Zhang, Q., Wu, L.: Building Auto-Encoder Intrusion Detection System based on random forest feature selection. Comput. Secur. 95 , 101851 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101851

Shahraki, A., Abbasi, M., Haugen, Ø.: Boosting algorithms for network intrusion detection: a comparative evaluation of real AdaBoost, gentle AdaBoost and modest AdaBoost. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 94 , 103770 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103770

Alazzam, H., Sharieh, A., Sabri, K.E.: A feature selection algorithm for intrusion detection system based on pigeon inspired optimizer. Expert Syst. Appl. 148 , 113249 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113249

Zhou, Y., Mazzuchi, T.A., Sarkani, S.: M-AdaBoost-A based ensemble system for network intrusion detection. Expert Syst. Appl. 162 , 113864 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113864

Thilagam, T., Aruna, R.: Intrusion detection for network based cloud computing by custom RC-NN and optimization. ICT Express 7 (4), 512–520 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2021.04.006

Zhao, H., Li, M., Zhao, H.: Artificial intelligence based ensemble approach for intrusion detection systems. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 71 , 102736 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2019.102736

Rajesh Kanna, P., Santhi, P.: Unified deep learning approach for efficient intrusion detection system using integrated spatial-temporal features. Knowl. Based Syst. 226 , 107132 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107132

Sona, A.S., Sasirekha, N.: Kulczynski indexed dragonfly feature optimization based Polytomous Adaptive Base classifier for anomaly intrusion detection. Mater. Today Proc. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.765

Alazzam, H., Sharieh, A., Sabri, K.E.: A lightweight intelligent network intrusion detection system using OCSVM and pigeon inspired optimizer. Appl. Intell. 52 (4), 3527–3544 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02621-x

Disha, R.A., Waheed, S.: Performance analysis of machine learning models for intrusion detection system using Gini impurity-based weighted random forest (GIWRF) feature selection technique. Cybersecurity 5 (1), 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-021-00103-8

Yerriswamy, T., Murtugudde, G.: An efficient algorithm for anomaly intrusion detection in a network. Glob. Trans. Proc. 2 (2), 255–260 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gltp.2021.08.066

Narayana Rao, K., Venkata Rao, K., Prasad Reddy, P.V.G.D.: A hybrid intrusion detection system based on sparse autoencoder and deep neural network. Comput. Commun. 180 , 77–88 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.08.026

Sharma, N.V., Yadav, N.S.: An optimal intrusion detection system using recursive feature elimination and ensemble of classifiers. Microprocess. Microsyst 85 , 104293 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2021.104293

Halim, Z., et al.: An effective genetic algorithm-based feature selection method for intrusion detection systems. Comput. Secur. 110 , 102448 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102448

Mazini, M., Shirazi, B., Mahdavi, I.: Anomaly network-based intrusion detection system using a reliable hybrid artificial bee colony and AdaBoost algorithms. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 31 (4), 541–553 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.03.011

Souhail, M., et al.: Network based intrusion detection using the UNSW-NB15 dataset. Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst. 8 , 477 (2019)

Hafiza Anisa, A., Anum, H., Narmeen Zakaria, B.: Network intrusion detection using oversampling technique and machine learning algorithms. PeerJ Comput. Sci. (2022). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.820

Aljawarneh, S., Aldwairi, M., Yassein, M.B.: Anomaly-based intrusion detection system through feature selection analysis and building hybrid efficient model. J. Comput. Sci. 25 , 152–160 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2017.03.006

Tama, B.A., Comuzzi, M., Rhee, K.: TSE-IDS: a two-stage classifier ensemble for intelligent anomaly-based intrusion detection system. IEEE Access 7 , 94497–94507 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928048

Dwivedi, S., Vardhan, M., Tripathi, S., Shukla, A.K.: Implementation of adaptive scheme in evolutionary technique for anomaly-based intrusion detection. Evol. Intell. 13 (1), 103–117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-019-00293-8

Devan, P., Khare, N.: An efficient XGBoost–DNN-based classification model for network intrusion detection system. Neural Comput. Appl. 32 (16), 12499–12514 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04708-x

Yang, Y., Zheng, K., Wu, C., Yang, Y.: Improving the classification effectiveness of intrusion detection by using improved conditional variational autoencoder and deep neural network. Sensors (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19112528

Krishnaveni, S., Vigneshwar, P., Kishore, S., Jothi, B., Sivamohan, S.: Anomaly-based intrusion detection system using support vector machine. In: Dash, S.S., Lakshmi, C., Das, S., Panigrahi, B.K. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence and Evolutionary Computations in Engineering Systems, pp. 723–731. Springer Singapore, Singapore (2020)

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Ahmad, I., Ul Haq, Q.E., Imran, M., Alassafi, M.O., AlGhamdi, R.A.: An efficient network intrusion detection and classification system. Mathematics (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030530

Qureshi A.U.H., Larijani H., Ahmad J., Mtetwa N.: A novel random neural network based approach for intrusion detection systems. In 2018 10th Computer Science and Electronic Engineering (CEEC), 19–21 Sept 2018, pp. 50–55. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/CEEC.2018.8674228

Gao, X., Shan, C., Hu, C., Niu, Z., Liu, Z.: An adaptive ensemble machine learning model for intrusion detection. IEEE Access 7 , 82512–82521 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2923640

Xiao, Y., Xing, C., Zhang, T., Zhao, Z.: An intrusion detection model based on feature reduction and convolutional neural networks. IEEE Access 7 , 42210–42219 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2904620

Zhou, Y., Cheng, G., Jiang, S., Dai, M.: Building an efficient intrusion detection system based on feature selection and ensemble classifier. Comput. Netw. 174 , 107247 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107247

Li, X., Yi, P., Wei, W., Jiang, Y., Tian, L.: LNNLS-KH: a feature selection method for network intrusion detection. Secur. Commun. Netw. 2021 , 8830431 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8830431

Chiche, A., Meshesha, M.: Towards a Scalable and Adaptive Learning Approach for Network Intrusion Detection. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. 2021 , 8845540 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8845540

Lv, L., Wang, W., Zhang, Z., Liu, X.: A novel intrusion detection system based on an optimal hybrid kernel extreme learning machine. Knowl. Based Syst. 195 , 105648 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105648

Jiang, K., Wang, W., Wang, A., Wu, H.: Network intrusion detection combined hybrid sampling with deep hierarchical network. IEEE Access 8 , 32464–32476 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2973730

Kumar, V., Sinha, D., Das, A.K., Pandey, S.C., Goswami, R.T.: An integrated rule based intrusion detection system: analysis on UNSW-NB15 data set and the real time online dataset. Clust. Comput. 23 (2), 1397–1418 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-019-03008-x

Kanimozhi, V., Jacob, T.P.: Artificial intelligence outflanks all other machine learning classifiers in network intrusion detection system on the realistic cyber dataset CSE-CIC-IDS2018 using cloud computing. ICT Express 7 (3), 366–370 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2020.12.004

Hadem, P., Saikia, D.K., Moulik, S.: An SDN-based intrusion detection system using SVM with selective logging for IP traceback. Comput. Netw. 191 , 108015 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108015

Abbasi, J.S., Bashir, F., Qureshi, K.N., Najam ul Islam, M., Jeon, G.: Deep learning-based feature extraction and optimizing pattern matching for intrusion detection using finite state machine. Comput. Electr. Eng. 92 , 107094 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107094

Kayode Saheed, Y., Idris Abiodun, A., Misra, S., Kristiansen Holone, M., Colomo-Palacios, R.: A machine learning-based intrusion detection for detecting internet of things network attacks. Alex. Eng. J. 61 (12), 9395–9409 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.02.063

D’Agostini, G.: A multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes’ theorem. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 362 (2), 487–498 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(95)00274-X

Box, G.E.P., Tiao, G.C.: Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Int. Stat. Rev. 43 , 242 (1973)

MATH   Google Scholar  

Ng A., Jordan M.I.: On discriminative versus generative classifiers: a comparison of logistic regression and naive Bayes. In: NIPS. (2001)

Soucy P., Mineau G. W.: A simple KNN algorithm for text categorization. In: Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 29 Nov-2 Dec 2001, pp. 647–648. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2001.989592 .

Li, W.-C., Yi, P., Wu, Y., Pan, L., Li, J.: A new intrusion detection system based on knn classification algorithm in wireless sensor network. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2014 , 240217 (2014)

Google Scholar  

Kotsiantis S.B.: Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques. In: Presented at the Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering: Real Word AI Systems with Applications in eHealth, HCI, Information Retrieval and Pervasive Technologies. (2007)

Du W., Zhan Z.: Building decision tree classifier on private data. In: Presented at the Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security and Data Mining, vol. 14, Maebashi City, Japan. (2002)

Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1 (1), 81–106 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116251

Kotsiantis, S.B.: Decision trees: a recent overview. Artif. Intell. Rev. 39 (4), 261–283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9272-4

Loh, W.-Y.: Classification and regression trees. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discovery 1 (1), 14–23 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.8

Kim, G., Lee, S., Kim, S.: A novel hybrid intrusion detection method integrating anomaly detection with misuse detection. Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (4), 1690–1700 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.066

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Goeschel, K.: Reducing false positives in intrusion detection systems using data-mining techniques utilizing support vector machines, decision trees, and naive Bayes for off-line analysis. SoutheastCon 2016 , 1–6 (2016)

Deng, H., Runger, G., Tuv, E.: Bias of importance measures for multi-valued attributes and solutions. In: Honkela, T., Duch, W., Girolami, M., Kaski, S. (eds.) Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning—ICANN 2011, pp. 293–300. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2011)

Tong, S., Koller, D.: Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2 , 45–66 (2001)

Miranda, C., Kaddoum, G., Bou-Harb, E., Garg, S., Kaur, K.: A collaborative security framework for software-defined wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 15 , 2602–2615 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2020.2973875

Liu, Y., Pi, D.: A novel kernel SVM algorithm with game theory for network intrusion detection. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 11 , 4043–4060 (2017)

Hu W., Liao Y., Vemuri V.R.: Robust support vector machines for anomaly detection in computer security. In: ICMLA. (2003)

Cutler, D.R., et al.: Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88 (11), 2783–2792 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0539.1

Buczak, A.L., Guven, E.: A survey of data mining and machine learning methods for cyber security intrusion detection. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor 18 , 1153–1176 (2016)

R. Doshi, N. Apthorpe, and N. Feamster, “Machine Learning DDoS Detection for Consumer Internet of Things Devices,” in 2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) , 24–24 May 2018 2018, pp. 29–35, https://doi.org/10.1109/SPW.2018.00013

Pal, N.R., Pal, K., Keller, J.M., Bezdek, J.C.: A possibilistic fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 13 , 517–530 (2005)

Moustafa N., Ahmed M., Ahmed S.: Data analytics-enabled intrusion detection: evaluations of ToN_IoT Linux datasets. In: 2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom), 29 Dec–1 Jan 2021, pp. 727–735. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TrustCom50675.2020.00100 .

Abdi, H., Williams, L.J.: Principal component analysis. WIREs Comput. Stat. 2 (4), 433–459 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101

Huang, G.-B., Zhu, Q.-Y., Siew, C.-K.: Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70 (1), 489–501 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521 (7553), 436–444 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Chen, X.W., Lin, X.: Big data deep learning: challenges and perspectives. IEEE Access 2 , 514–525 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2325029

Ciresan D.C., Meier U., Masci J., Gambardella L.M., Schmidhuber J.: Flexible, high performance convolutional neural networks for image classification. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2011)

Chen Y., Zhang Y., Maharjan S.: Deep learning for secure mobile edge computing. arXiv:1709.08025 (2017)

Hermans M., Schrauwen B.: Training and analyzing deep recurrent neural networks. In: NIPS 2013. (2013)

Pascanu R., Gülçehre Ç., Cho K., Bengio Y.: How to construct deep recurrent neural networks. In: CoRR. arXiv:1312.6026 (2014)

Nweke, H.F., Teh, Y.W., Al-garadi, M.A., Alo, U.R.: Deep learning algorithms for human activity recognition using mobile and wearable sensor networks: state of the art and research challenges. Expert Syst. Appl. 105 , 233–261 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.056

Tang T.A., Mhamdi L., McLernon D., Zaidi S.A.R., Ghogho M.: Deep recurrent neural network for intrusion detection in sdn-based networks. In: 2018 4th IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization and Workshops (NetSoft), 25–29 June 2018, pp. 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1109/NETSOFT.2018.8460090

Yu, Y., Si, X., Hu, C., Zhang, J.: A review of recurrent neural networks: LSTM cells and network architectures. Neural Comput. 31 (7), 1235–1270 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_01199

Gers F.A., Schmidhuber J., Cummins F.: Learning to forget: continual prediction with LSTM. In: 1999 Ninth International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks ICANN 99. (Conf. Publ. No. 470), 7–10 Sept. 1999, vol. 2, pp. 850–855. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp:19991218 .

Bai S., Kolter J.Z., Koltun V.: An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling. arXiv:1803.01271 (2018)

Tschannen M., Bachem O., Lucic M.: Recent advances in autoencoder-based representation learning. arXiv:1812.05069 (2018)

Hinton, G.E.: A practical guide to training restricted Boltzmann machines. In: Montavon, G., Orr, G.B., Müller, K.-R. (eds.) Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, 2nd edn., pp. 599–619. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)

Mayuranathan, M., Murugan, M., Dhanakoti, V.: Best features based intrusion detection system by RBM model for detecting DDoS in cloud environment. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 12 , 3609–3619 (2021)

Fiore, U., Palmieri, F., Castiglione, A., Santis, A.D.: Network anomaly detection with the restricted Boltzmann machine. Neurocomput. 122 , 13–23 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2012.11.050

Keyvanrad M.A., Homayounpour M.M.: A brief survey on deep belief networks and introducing a new object oriented MATLAB toolbox (DeeBNet). arXiv:1408.3264 (2014)

Dietterich, T.G.: Ensemble methods in machine learning. In: Goos, G., Hartmanis, J., van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) Multiple Classifier Systems, pp. 1–15. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2000)

Woniak, M., Graña, M., Corchado, E.: A survey of multiple classifier systems as hybrid systems. Inf. Fusion 16 , 3–17 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2013.04.006

Illy P., Kaddoum G., Moreira C.M., Kaur K., Garg S.: securing fog-to-things environment using intrusion detection system based on ensemble learning. In: 2019 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 1–7. (2019)

Domingos, P.M.: A few useful things to know about machine learning. Commun. ACM 55 , 78–87 (2012)

Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24 (2), 123–140 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058655

Baba, N.M., Makhtar, M., Fadzli, S.A., Awang, M.K.: Current issues in ensemble methods and its applicaTIONS. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 8 , 1 (2015)

Santana L.E.A., Silva L., Canuto A.M.P., Pintro F., Vale K.M.O.: A comparative analysis of genetic algorithm and ant colony optimization to select attributes for an heterogeneous ensemble of classifiers. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1–8. (2010)

Bosman, H.H.W.J., Iacca, G., Tejada, A., Wörtche, H.J., Liotta, A.: Ensembles of incremental learners to detect anomalies in ad hoc sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 35 , 14–36 (2015)

Chen T., Guestrin C.: XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. (2016)

Kumar, P., Gupta, G.P., Tripathi, R.: A distributed ensemble design based intrusion detection system using fog computing to protect the internet of things networks. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 12 (10), 9555–9572 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02696-3

Ke G., et al.: LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In: NIPS. (2017)

Aldwairi M., Alshboul M. A., Seyam A.: Characterizing realistic signature-based intrusion detection benchmarks. In: Presented at the Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Technology: IoT and Smart City, Hong Kong. (2018). Available at https://doi.org/10.1145/3301551.3301591

ManoharNaik, S., Geethanjali, N.: A multi-fusion pattern matching algorithm for signature-based network intrusion detection system. Preprints 2016 , 1–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201608.0197.v1

Folorunso, O., Ayo, F.E., Babalola, Y.E.: Ca-NIDS: a network intrusion detection system using combinatorial algorithm approach. J. Inf. Priv. Secur. 12 (4), 181–196 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/15536548.2016.1257680

Rao, C.S., Raju, K.B.: MapReduce accelerated signature-based intrusion detection mechanism (IDM) with pattern matching mechanism. In: Nayak, J., Abraham, A., Krishna, B.M., Chandra Sekhar, G.T., Das, A.K. (eds.) Soft Computing in Data Analytics, pp. 157–164. Springer Singapore, Singapore (2019)

Aho, A.V., Corasick, M.J.: Efficient string matching. Commun. ACM 18 , 333–340 (1975)

Alicherry, M., Muthuprasanna, M., Kumar, V.P.: High speed pattern matching for network IDS/IPS. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols , pp. 187–196. (2006)

Knuth, D.E., Morris, J.H., Pratt, V.R.: Fast pattern matching in strings. SIAM J. Comput. 6 , 323–350 (1977)

Wu, S., Manber, U.: A fast algorithm for multi-pattern searching. (1999)

Boyer, R.S., Moore, J.S.: A fast string searching algorithm. Commun. ACM 20 (10), 762–772 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1145/359842.359859

Kaur, S., Singh, M.: Hybrid intrusion detection and signature generation using deep recurrent neural networks. Neural Comput. Appl. 32 (12), 7859–7877 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04187-9

Liu, J., et al.: Adaptive intrusion detection via GA-GOGMM-based pattern learning with fuzzy rough set-based attribute selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 139 , 112845 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112845

Kalavadekar, P.N., Sane, S.S.: Building an effective intrusion detection system using combined signature and anomaly detection techniques. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 8 (10), 429 (2019)

Ugtakhbayar, N., Usukhbayar, B., Baigaltugs, S.: A Hybrid model for anomaly-based intrusion detection system. In: Pan, J.-S., Li, J., Tsai, P.-W., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing, pp. 419–431. Springer Singapore, Singapore (2020)

Asharf, J., Moustafa, N., Khurshid, H., Debie, E., Haider, W., Wahab, A.: A review of intrusion detection systems using machine and deep learning in internet of things: challenges, solutions and future directions. Electronics 9 (7), 1177 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9071177

Bhati, N.S., Khari, M., García-Díaz, V., Verdú, E.: A Review on Intrusion Detection Systems and Techniques. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 28 (Supp 02), 65–91 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218488520400140

Patel, A., Taghavi, M., Bakhtiyari, K., Celestino Júnior, J.: An intrusion detection and prevention system in cloud computing: a systematic review. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 36 (1), 25–41 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2012.08.007

Hwang, R.H., Peng, M.C., Huang, C.W., Lin, P.C., Nguyen, V.L.: An unsupervised deep learning model for early network traffic anomaly detection. IEEE Access 8 , 30387–30399 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2973023

Nagaraju, S., Shanmugham, B., Baskaran, K.: High throughput token driven FSM based regex pattern matching for network intrusion detection system. Mater. Today Proc. 47 , 139–143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.028 . Accessed 1 Jan 2021

AlYousef, M.Y., Abdelmajeed, N.T.: Dynamically detecting security threats and updating a signature-based intrusion detection system’s database. Procedia Comput. Sci. 159 , 1507–1516 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.321

Almutairi A.H., Abdelmajeed N.T.: Innovative signature based intrusion detection system: parallel processing and minimized database. In: 2017 International Conference on the Frontiers and Advances in Data Science (FADS), 23–25 Oct 2017, pp. 114–119. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/FADS.2017.8253208 .

Download references

The author did not receive any support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

EuroMed Research Center, School of Digital Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, Euro-Mediterranean University of Fes, Fes, 30030, Morocco

Oluwadamilare Harazeem Abdulganiyu & Taha Ait Tchakoucht

School of IT and Computing, American University of Nigeria, Yola, Nigeria

Yakub Kayode Saheed

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar


OHA came up with the idea for the article, he also performed the literature search and the drafting, while the data analysis and synthesis were carried out by OHA, TA-T, and SYK. TA-T critically revised the work and make inputs where necessary.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oluwadamilare Harazeem Abdulganiyu .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this paper.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Abdulganiyu, O.H., Ait Tchakoucht, T. & Saheed, Y.K. A systematic literature review for network intrusion detection system (IDS). Int. J. Inf. Secur. 22 , 1125–1162 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-023-00682-2

Download citation

Accepted : 08 March 2023

Published : 27 March 2023

Issue Date : October 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-023-00682-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Network intrusion detection system
  • Signature-based
  • Anomaly-based
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Pattern matching
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research


  1. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines

    This is why the literature review as a research method is more relevant than ever. Traditional literature reviews often lack thoroughness and rigor and are conducted ad hoc, rather than following a specific methodology. Therefore, questions can be raised about the quality and trustworthiness of these types of reviews.

  2. How to Write a Literature Review

    Examples of literature reviews. Step 1 - Search for relevant literature. Step 2 - Evaluate and select sources. Step 3 - Identify themes, debates, and gaps. Step 4 - Outline your literature review's structure. Step 5 - Write your literature review.

  3. A network approach toward literature review

    This study introduces a method that uses a network approach towards literature review. To employ this approach, we use hypotheses proposed in scientific publications as building blocks. In network terms, a hypothesis is a directed tie between two concepts or nodes. The network emerges by aggregating the hypotheses from a set of articles in a specific domain. This study explains the method and ...

  4. How to Write a Literature Review: Six Steps to Get You from ...

    Step One: Decide on your areas of research: Before you begin to search for articles or books, decide beforehand what areas you are going to research. Make sure that you only get articles and books in those areas, even if you come across fascinating books in other areas. A literature review I am currently working on, for example, explores ...

  5. Servant Leadership: a Systematic Literature Review and Network Analysis

    The paper is based on a two-step method, referred to as "Systematic Literature Network Analysis (SLNA)" (Colicchia & Strozzi, 2012): a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and a further analysis of the subset of relevant articles obtained through a bibliographic Network Analysis (NA): namely, the citation network analysis, the co-occurrence networks analysis and the basic statistics.

  6. PDF A network approach toward literature review

    reviewing literature combined with network analysis in different research areas (Bouwman et al. 2006; Van de Wijngaert et al. 2006, 2008). To provide a proof of concept, we present, as a case study, a network approach to review the literature on the adoption of eGovernment 123

  7. 5. The Literature Review

    A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories.A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that ...

  8. Leading Networks Effectively: Literature Review and Propositions

    The current comprehensive literature review aims to contribute to network leadership research and enable a better understanding of effective network leadership. As network forms of organizing are increasingly needed, due to the progressively dynamic and complex nature of the workplace (Karriker, Madden, & Katell, 2017 ; Lapierre & Carsten, 2014 ...

  9. Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide

    Example: Predictors and Outcomes of U.S. Quality Maternity Leave: A Review and Conceptual Framework: 10.1177/08948453211037398 ; Systematic review: "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139).

  10. Research Guides: Literature Reviews: What is a Literature Review?

    A literature review is meant to analyze the scholarly literature, make connections across writings and identify strengths, weaknesses, trends, and missing conversations. A literature review should address different aspects of a topic as it relates to your research question. A literature review goes beyond a description or summary of the ...

  11. What is a literature review?

    A literature or narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific topic or research question. The literature that is reviewed contains: books, articles, academic articles, conference proceedings, association papers, and dissertations. It contains the most pertinent studies and points to important ...

  12. Network theory

    W~ 0 mm R ii Network theory - a systematic method for literature review Nurse Education Todav (1992)12,44-50 Longman Group UK Ltd 1992 Stephen E O'Connor This article sets out the nature and purpose of the literature review as it is found in the nursing research literature. The `standard' method of the construction of a review is set out and ...

  13. Litmaps

    Our Mastering Literature Review with Litmaps course allows instructors to seamlessly bring Litmaps into the classroom to teach fundamental literature review and research concepts. Learn More. Join the 250,000+ researchers, students, and professionals using Litmaps to accelerate their literature review. Find the right papers faster.

  14. Research Guides: Psychology: Conducting a Literature Review

    6. Incorporate the literature review into your research paper draft. (note: this step is only if you are using the literature review to write a research paper. Many times the literature review is an end unto itself). After the literature review is complete, you should incorporate it into your research paper (if you are writing the review as one ...

  15. A systematic literature review on network marketing ...

    Since an SLR is a widely used approach to review literature (Linnenluecke et al., 2020; Vrontis & Christofi, 2021), it appears to be the most suitable approach to achieving the objectives of the current review, i.e., to synthesize the network marketing literature intricately and propose future research avenues.

  16. A Systematic Literature Network Analysis: Development of ...

    Systematic literature network analysis (SLNA) is a modified methodology developed by Colicchia and Strozzi [] in 2012 which consists of two parts: systematic literature review (SLR) and citation network analysis (CNA).SLR is used to select the most related articles for the analysis and CNA is used to analyze the development of the knowledge based on the bibliographic information, such as ...

  17. Network Effects Research: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Mechanisms

    We conducted a systematic review of empirical network effects research in 40 public administration and policy journals from 1998 to 2019. We reviewed and coded 89 articles and described the main social theories used in the network effectiveness literature and the associated mechanisms that translate network structures to network effects.

  18. Leading Networks Effectively: Literature Review and Propositions

    A literature review is presented on the modes of effective network leadership within and between organizations. In total, 163 published studies, both empirical and conceptual, were parsed with ...

  19. A Structured Literature Review on Networks and Organizations

    2 Methodology. This chapter aims at analysing the main trends and characteristics of the literature regarding networks and organizations in the last 20 years (2002-2021). Following Massaro, Dumay, and Guthrie ( 2016) we developed a structured literature review, starting with setting boundaries to our research.

  20. Networking capability: a systematic review of literature and future

    Third, the authors found that the focal firms' NC consists of two key dimensions: network development capability (NDC) and network management capability (NMC). Fourth, they contribute to the literature by providing a set of suggestions for further research in the NC literature stream.,This study has some limitations, like other review studies.

  21. PDF Network Effects Research: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Mechanisms

    We conducted a systematic review of empirical network effects research in 40 journals of public administration and policy from 1998 to 2019. We reviewed and coded 89 articles and described the main social theories used in the network effectiveness literature and the associated mechanisms that translate network structures to network effects.

  22. Large Language Models for Cyber Security: A Systematic Literature Review

    The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened up new opportunities for leveraging artificial intelligence in various domains, including cybersecurity. As the volume and sophistication of cyber threats continue to grow, there is an increasing need for intelligent systems that can automatically detect vulnerabilities, analyze malware, and respond to attacks. In this survey, we ...

  23. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and networks: a literature review and

    This study applies a systematic literature review (SLR) on entrepreneurial ecosystems and networks (EEs&Ns) as its methodology. Widely adopted across disciplines and fields of study, the SLR research methodology has experienced tremendous growth and evolution over recent years (Kraus et al. 2020; Snyder 2019; Torraco 2016). According to Snyder (), the core characteristics of SLRs are their ...

  24. A systematic literature review for network intrusion detection system

    A thorough evaluation was carried out by [] on IDS with a focus on the signature- and anomaly-based approaches; however, a systematic literature review approach was not followed, and there was also no in-depth analysis or comparisons of the methods, datasets, attacks, or performances of the techniques.In the same vein, [] followed a systematic approach to reviewing hybrid-based IDS; however ...